Drama and the Postmodern: Assessing the Limits of Metatheatre
Powered By Xquantum

Drama and the Postmodern: Assessing the Limits of Metatheatre By ...

Read
image Next

As Prapassaree Kramer describes Caryl Churchill’s work in “Top Girls: Postmodern Imperfect,” Top Girls also employs many of the traditional features of postmodernism, especially in the first act:

We seem to be in the realm of the postmodern eclectic, a playful mix of perspectives and costumes which challenge our grasp on reality and render all debates ultimately undecidable. What may appear a chaotic bricolage, however, comes to resolve itself into a decisive conclusion about the protagonist’s failures of comprehension on both a political and human level (and implicitly, therefore, a decisive conclusion about the correct perspective on these human and political issues). (235 in this volume)

Churchill’s commitment to various postmodern features is part and parcel of a larger concern on her part: That is, the explicitly socialist-feminist works of her immediate peers ignore some of the larger issues faced by women in the Thatcher era. However, even while Churchill retains a tendency to reject epistemological trends generally, her desire to pursue claims against both feminism and the patriarchy ultimately necessitates her turn toward realism in the second two acts of the work.

The basically realistic portrait of the modern world in the second and third acts serves to quash any such temptation to complacency and also to reinforce the themes of the inadequacy of a feminism based on individualist premises. …With its “retreat” into realism, Top Girls may be said to deny us any sense of constant progress towards a state of greater freedom, both on a political and a literary level. Its “imperfect” postmodernism is a feature–not a bug. (252 in this volume)

Perhaps while similarly motivated as her peers, this final turn toward realism might best be regarded as regressive rather moving beyond the postmodern given how slight is its self-consciousness about the tension between political progressivism and postmodernity.

James Fisher is understandably reluctant to peg Tony Kushner as postmodern, at least in part because Kushner has described himself as a “premodern modernist…not quite ready for postmodernism” (255 in