Chapter 2: | Legacy for Dance as a Discipline: 1917–1967 |
This is a limited free preview of this book. Please buy full access.
That the student “made their own,” and “away from the pull of gravity,” one might work out “what really are the structural changes of position of the body” became the guiding principles for H’Doubler’s approach to dance education. The idea of dance as a creative art informed by understanding the science of human movement was hugely innovative. Yet the approach to teaching dance in the university she developed both served and limited her career over the next three-and-a-half decades.
H’Doubler’s educational perspectives were decidedly in favor of amateurism. Wisconsin alumna Beatrice Richardson contributed “The Development of Dance at the University of Wisconsin,” to the 1937 Physical Education Association’s Alumnae News Journal. Here, Richardson summarizes both H’Doubler’s epiphany in dance education and her rejection of a decadent professionalism:
Like most of her colleagues in women’s physical education, H’Doubler rejected professional values in sports and play, and believed physical education, dance, or any organized and thoughtful physical activity should primarily lend itself to “the development of personality.”