Chapter 1: | Introduction |
To conduct a rhetorical analysis, then, is to conduct an analysis of the culture, of the discourse, that surrounds the words, the norms, the systems that shape, in this case, past medical practice that brought about a rise in intersex activism, and a resulting alternative rhetoric that has served to modify perception and practice of the treatment of intersexuality. Rhetorical analysis, therefore, is not just an amusing dance with words. Rhetoric is representative of and contributor to a complex, dynamic discourse of values, truths, and rules. A study of the rhetoric produced online by intersex communities, in response to a particular rhetoric espoused for some time regarding the treatment of intersexuality, enables us to take a different approach from previous criticism to comprehending the medicalization of intersexuality as well as the forces at play that have shaped productive resistance to it.
There are many examples of rhetoric at work as producer and product of the medical discourse surrounding intersexuality. Let’s explore one briefly to show just how much intersexuality is a cultural or rhetorical construct. Read first Gayle’s story, told online at the Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome’s support group Web site: