Cinematic Portraits of Evil: Christian de Chalonge’s Docteur Petiot and Jean-Pierre Jeunet’s Delicatessen
Powered By Xquantum

Cinematic Portraits of Evil: Christian de Chalonge’s Docteur Peti ...

Chapter 1:  Representing Atrocity
Read
image Next

representations, this aside from any construction of meaning. As Austin states:

Holocaust and occupation are considered susceptible to documentary, classical realism approach. Horror, fantasy and farce are seen as ‘culturally low’ genres. That which is ‘appropriate’ has been challenged in the 1990s by films which run counter to classical realist tradition. 7

One may argue that the unique character of the Holocaust experience ‘demands’ rather than merely ‘accommodates’ artistic disfiguration—a reality so fantastic and extraordinary (or sub-ordinary) that it denounces all structured formulations of human logic and defies the basic human notions of empirical reality, the raw material of every mimetic art. The reality of the Holocaust may itself be considered an ‘unreality’, not through denial of historical fact but through the very magnitude of this fact as it awaits mental absorption. The concentration camp may, in this sense, be considered a place of fusion, a place where that which is real and that which is unreal (in terms of its inconceivability) co-exist as a fundamental principle of experience. How does and how should cinema respond to this co-existence? Cinema must seek somehow to locate within itself the means to penetrate the darkest recesses of human experience and tear itself away from conventional thought patterns. The necessity of such a response coincides with Langer's recognition of the requirement of cinema to

establish an order of reality in which the unimaginable becomes imaginatively acceptable and exceeds the capacities of an art devoted entirely to verisimilitude, some quality of the fantastic, whether stylistic or descriptive, becomes an extremely essential ingredient of l'univers concentrationnaire. 8