Chapter : | Introduction |
Moscovici himself insists on the primacy of social representation theory relative to other concepts like attitudes and social cognition, saying, “the idea of collective or social representation is older than all these notions and…it is part of the ‘genetic code’ of all the human sciences” (225), providing us with a versatile starting point given our interest in how meaning is created, maintained, and communicated among and between groups.
Thought, according to Moscovici, is to “be considered as an environment,” given the aforementioned conventional and prescriptive roles of social representations that create and define such an environment (21):
The cause-and-effect relation, equating how people think with what people think—to create knowledge, meaning, even reality—becomes readily apparent, especially as subjects create reality as members of a group. Social representations do not simply describe, they also bring into being, and often do so by appealing to tradition, wherein a “certain past” is normative, reminding us of the importance of memory—or a “certain memory”—in the formula of collective representation (see Connerton 58, 100).