historical perspectives, 33 |
hybrid positions, xvii |
hybrid selves, xviii |
hybridity, xv–xvi |
hybridity discourse, xvi |
ideological implications, 4 |
indigenous groups, xvii |
inductive approach, 65 |
inductive models, 6 |
inferior treatment model, 40 |
inquiry, xxiii–xxiv, 1, 3–4, 10, 22–23, 33, 35, 38, 44–45, 51, 54, 64–65, 68, 74, 102, 105, 139, 144–147, 152–153, 192 |
inquiry-based curricula, 23 |
institutional racism, 3 |
interdisciplinary curricula, 23 |
internal validity, 60–61 |
investigator triangulation, 64 |
knowledge systems, xvii–xviii, xxi–xxii, 7, 15 |
Life Sciences, 74 |
Likert-type, 61 |
literacy-oriented, 118 |
local history, 61 |
logical positivists, 6 |
majority-minority, 5 |
member checks, 65 |
methodological purity, 44 |
methodological triangulation, 64 |
modeling, 54 |
National Assessment of Educational Process (NAEP), 21–22, 153 |
National Research Council (NRC), xxiii, 2–4, 9, 20, 23, 113, 196, 198 |
National Science Education Standards (NSES), 2, 20, 148, 196, 198 |
Native Americans, 3 |
Nature of Science, 4, 29, 37, 54, 74, 143–148, 194, 199, 201 |
neoconservative, 39 |
nonequivalent groups, 58 |
normative culture of science, xv |
observer bias, 67 |
Ohio Department of Education, 73–74 |