|
|
List of Figures
|
Figure 1. Koul's (1997) themes of contextualized curriculum and the framework of contextualized curriculum (CC) used in the study. |
|
Figure 2. Traditional versus contextualized curriculum. |
|
Figure 3. Student engagement scores on category I (facilitating the learning process) of the ESTEEM instrument. |
|
Figure 4. Student engagement scores on category II (content-specific pedagogy) of the ESTEEM instrument. |
|
Figure 5. Student engagement scores on the ESTEEM instrument (categories I and II). |
|
Figure 6. Category I: Percentage of observation scores versus observation score categories. |
|
Figure 7. Category II: Percentage of observation scores versus observation score categories. |
|
Figure 8. ESTEEM: Percentage of observation scores versus observation score categories. |
|
Figure 9. Revised conceptual map of Koul's (1997) themes of contextualized curricula and the contextualized curriculum (CC) used in the study. |