Chapter 1: | Discourse on Motivation and Children |
This is a limited free preview of this book. Please buy full access.
Ir
da in Children
The question of whether irda exists in children was mainly addressed by Muslim jurists in the medieval Muslim period. There was a general consensus among them that individuals are not held responsible for their actions until they reach the age of maturity (bul
gh) and become b
ligh (mature). This position is based on the following Hadith:


In commenting on the Hadith, al-Shib
(d. 790/1388) stated, ‘All of these classes of people have no intention (qa
d), which is the reason for removing the rulings of takl
f [responsibility and obligation] from them’. He also mentioned the scholarly consensus on this.75 A person who is not completely rational (‘
qil) does not possess the kind of ‘want’ that will make him accountable for his actions. Thus, his deeds cannot possibly be classified as permissible, prohibited, obligatory, and so forth.76
Based on the aforementioned reasons, irda appears to be fully developed only when an individual reaches puberty. This is also the view of al-Ghazz
l
, who stated, ‘Initially, a child does not possess ir
da; rather, it occurs after bul
gh and that is also the case with the ‘aql [faculty of reason]’.77 Nevertheless, the medieval Muslim jurists differed as to when a person actually attains maturity, thereby reaching the age of takl
f and becoming a mukallaf (one who is burdened with responsibility and is held accountable for his or her actions in Islam).