| Chapter 1: | The Domestic Analogy |
|
|
This is a limited free preview of this book. Please buy full access.
Notes
1. For more on President Wilson and the League of Nations, see chapter 2.
2. Samuel P. Huntington, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991).
3. See, e.g., Michael Walzer, “The Reform of the International System.” In Studies of War and Peace, ed. Oyvind Osterud (Oslo: Norwegian University Press, 1986), 227–250.
4. President Wilson’s speech before Congress on April 2, 1917, when the United States declared war on Germany: “Making the World ‘Safe for Democracy’: Woodrow Wilson Asks for War,” http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/4943.
5. For the different approaches to world politics in 1919, see Hans F. Petersson, Power and International Order: An Analytical Study of Four Schools of Thought and their Approaches to the War, the Peace and a Post-War System, 1914–1919 (Lund: Gleerup, 1964). For the school of thought considered here (which Petersson labeled “radical”), see especially 92, 224, 228–229, 294, 337, 354.
6. David Held, “Democratic Accountability and Political Effectiveness from a Cosmopolitan Perspective,” Government and Opposition 39 (2004): 364–391.
7. Leif Lewin, Democratic Accountability: Why Choice in Politics Is Both Possible and Necessary (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007), 13.
8. Robert O. Keohane, “Accountability in World Politics,” Scandinavian Political Studies 29 (2006): 85.
9. Ruth W. Grant and Robert O. Keohane, “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics,” The American Political Science Review 99 (2005): 29–43.
10. Leif Lewin, Folket och eliterna: En studie i modern demokratisk teori [The People and the Elites: A Study in Modern Democratic Theory] (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1970).
11. Edward Hallett Carr, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (1939; London: Palgrave, 2001), 84.
12. Keohane has classified himself as an “interdependist.” He criticized realism on the grounds that states are not condemned to struggle for