Applying Andragogical Principles to Internet Learning
Powered By Xquantum

Applying Andragogical Principles to Internet Learning By Susan I ...

Read
image Next

This is a limited free preview of this book. Please buy full access.


The innate nature of technology will serve our American instincts for efficiency, individualism, and vocation rather than liberation, democracy, diversity and community. A careful study of unregulated markets and deregu­lation in America may serve to help us predict failures and design online learning technologies that truly advance democracy (p. 157).

Effective distance education must do more than inform and communicate. “Today’s online students need appropriate guidance for their assignments and relevant class discussions and activities” (Muirhead, 2004, ¶ 3). Further, “instructors can diminish student motivation by assigning an excessive number of assignments and having numerous discussion questions in their weekly dialogs” (2004, ¶ 3).

Distance education is popular and successful in the area of adult health promotion and disease management. Roughly 8 out of 10 Internet users have used the Internet to search for health information (Fox, 2006). “Many national groups, including the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health, have repeatedly emphasized the need for more evaluation research in this area” (Evers, 2006, p. 3). Evers (2006) examined the research on the impact and efficacy of Internet programs on health behavior and the results were promising.

A meta-analysis was conducted in 2004 to examine the effectiveness of web-based interventions on behavior-change outcomes … . Effects-size comparisons in the use of web-based interventions when compared with no-web-based interventions showed an improvement in outcomes for knowledge and behavior change for several different behaviors (p. 4).

Further research is needed in the area of distance learning and health promotion. Recruitment and retention continue to be a problem. “Developers and researchers need to move beyond a narrow focus on early adopters and produce a population perspective on recruitment and retention of participants in programs” (Evers, 2006, p. 6). Until the field of eHealth engages a larger percentage of the at-risk population, “they will not be able to realize their potential to be the lowest cost modality for delivering tailored communications that can have the highest potential impacts on health promotion, disease prevention, and disease management” (p. 6).