This is a limited free preview of this book. Please buy full access.
|
2.4.2.3 BearingPoint |
|
2.4.2.4 SAP |
|
2.4.2.5 Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology |
|
Chapter Three: Empirical study based upon Quantitative Questionnaire |
|
3.1 Objectives of the Empirical Examination |
|
3.1.1 Concretizing of aspects and formation of theses |
|
3.1.1.1 Overview of the performance terms relevant to the examination |
|
3.1.1.2 Clarification of the performance terms |
|
3.1.2 Establishment of hypotheses and SCOR model groups |
|
3.1.2.1 Intra-Performance Attribute (I-P) |
|
3.1.2.2 Intra-Competence (I-C) |
|
3.1.2.3 Inter-Competence/Performance Attribute (I-CP) |
|
3.1.2.4 Formulation of hypotheses and theses model |
|
3.1.2.5 Variations in approach and models for the illustration and measurement of the SC-performance |
|
3.2 Derivation of the Central Work Hypotheses |
|
3.2.1 Theses of the SCOR model groups Intra-Performance-Attribute (I-P) |
|
3.2.1.1 Performance Attribute Customer Service (reliability and responsiveness) |
|
3.2.1.2 Performance Attribute Flexibility |
|
3.2.1.3 Performance Attribute Cost |
|
3.2.1.4 Performance Attribute Assets |
|
3.2.2 Theses of the SCOR model group Intra-Competence (I-C) |
|
3.2.2.1 Customer-facing indicators |
|
3.2.2.2 Internal-facing indicators |
|
3.2.3 Theses of the SCOR model group Inter-Competence/Performance Attribute (I-CP) |