This is a limited free preview of this book. Please buy full access.
According to Milton, her model is saved from being an exclusively biological one because in it emotions are not innately fixed but are susceptible to change through learning.
Other aspects of the model she proposes reveal it to be perhaps not exclusively biological but nevertheless utterly unsocial—in several important respects. One of these has to do with the vestment of emotions in the person well prior to culture, well prior to sociality. But when is there such a time? When is a person ‘out of culture’, where, or perhaps who, can one be to avoid the social? Are emotions then, in Milton’s model, hardwired? And if they are, does biology precede the social?
While Milton (2005) acknowledges the importance of emotions in social situations, she finds it ‘difficult to accept the view that emotions are primarily and fundamentally social’ because ‘they operate so often outside social situations’ (p. 199). Milton proceeds then to list several instances in which she feels emotion, by herself:
But sociality is not the same as interpersonal exchange, which is really what Milton is discussing in her example above. Perhaps what is most striking about the examples Milton provides is their very sociality, and they are social even without the physical presence of another human being.