| Chapter : | Introduction |
This is a limited free preview of this book. Please buy full access.
In short, the use of qualitative data can both improve quantitative models and confirm model results and predictions. We contend that the multimethod approach provides a basis for bridging the gulf between the largely qualitative approach that characterizes studies of the presidency and the quantitative bent of congressional scholars.
Our qualitative data are drawn from several archival sources that provide considerable contemporary insight into political process and strategy.14 We not only draw heavily on the records of the Carter administration, but also incorporate substantial material from congressional sources. The Office of Congressional Liaison maintained detailed records of their efforts and the efforts of the president during the water wars. President Carter’s chief rival during this period was Tom Bevill, Chair of the House Subcommittee with jurisdiction over water projects. We capitalize on detailed records from his office to characterize the congressional response to Carter. We also make extensive use of detailed notes from White House meetings between Carter and the congressional leadership taken by John Brademas, the then House Democratic Whip, through much of this period.