To Vary or Not?  The Effects of Ad Variation on the Web
Powered By Xquantum

To Vary or Not? The Effects of Ad Variation on the Web By Sang Y ...

Read
image Next

Research has shown that this is particularly true for banner advertising (Dreze and Hussherr 2003). Yet little is known about the impact of avoiding messages. Recent work in cognitive psychology has found that trying to avoid focusing on distracting stimuli may serve to reduce its emotional salience, so that future exposures may attract less attention and actually serve to decrease affect (Raymond, Fenske and Tavassoli, 2003). Brittany Duff in our research group at Minnesota is currently developing a direct test of the application of this work on avoidance to advertising (Duff 2006). The interesting pattern found for banner advertising exposure reported in this book may ultimately turn out to be at least partially due to the affect of advertising avoidance over repeated exposures.

It is rare to find academic literature addressing any one of the factors that makes advertising distinctive. To find a work that touches on almost all of these factors is indeed impressive. To further do so in the context of real advertising situations and with actual brands makes this work truly unique. As such it represents a standard for the way meaningful advertising research should be carried out.

Professor Ronald J. Faber

Professor, School of Journalism and Mass Communication

University of Minnesota

Former Editor, Journal of Advertising

References

Calfee, John E., and Debra J. Reingold (1994). “The 70% Majority: Enduring Consumer Beliefs About Advertising.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 13, 228–238.
Dreze, Xavier and Francois X. Hussherr, (2003), “Internet Advertising: Is Anybody Watching?” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17 (4), 8-23.
Duff, Brittany (2006), “Attention Avoidance in Advertising: The Impact of Appetitive and Defensive Motivation,” Draft Thesis Proposal, School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Minnesota.