Chapter 1: | Introduction |
By ascribing the source of socioeconomic and academic successes to an “inherent quality” that is believed to be deeply ingrained in cultural practices, upward mobility becomes a feat that can be accomplished only if one is part of that group. Hence, the concept of model minority pitted Asian Americans against all other racial groups of color (Omi & Winant, 1994). This characterization was iterated in Andrew Hacker’s (1995) dichotomous depiction of the racial structure of the United States. Hacker’s Two Nations described the United States as being split into black and white and all other racial groups are subsumed into one of these two categories. He contends that Asian Americans should be categorized under white because of their relative ease in upward mobility as compared to other minority groups.
However, the diversity of Asian Americans and the increasing bifurcation in the immigrant characteristics today beg a reassessment of the model minority image in favor of more complex analyses of the experiences of Asian Americans. The focus on assimilation ignores the multiple ways in which Asian Americans understand their identities and self-hood in terms of race and ethnicity. Phoebe Eng’s (1999) reflection on conversations with her mother encapsulated this issue:
Phoebe Eng is not alone in believing that the lives of native-born Asian Americans are indelibly tied to the culture of the ancestral home and that parents are the bearers of these past values. However, as Eng’s mother dismisses, not every immigrant’s life in the United States is fraught with angst and isolation as depicted in Joy Luck Club, nor are native-born children’s lives marked entirely by the actions of their parents.